Monday, May 16, 2011

design background in photoshop

design background in photoshop. BEST PHOTOSHOP BRUSHES 03-
  • BEST PHOTOSHOP BRUSHES 03-



  • Popeye206
    Apr 28, 11:48 AM
    Yes, the iPhone does compete against Android. The last time I went into a AT&T or Verizon store, this was obvious. To say that the iPhone does not compete against Android is silly.


    When your sales numbers for phones are ~50% of that of your competitor; whereas a few years ago they were barely a blip, then yes that means they are getting kicked in the teeth in handset OS sales.

    Win... the point is, it's not hurting Apple. Apple continues to grow it's share. It's hurting the others. Android has replaced a hodge podge of OS's out there.

    So, it's not "kicking the teeth" out of iOS. That would only be a fair statement if Apple had a licensing program for others. But they don't. Moto, Samsung and others ran to Android because their own efforts were abysmal and they needed to do something before Apple owned the smart phone universe.

    Yes, it has slowed Apple's adoption because it is a very attractive alternative, but again... not a fair comparison and if anyone is getting teeth rattled, it's RIM. They have been consistently loosing market share and it's not looking good for BB.





    design background in photoshop. How To Design An Abstract
  • How To Design An Abstract



  • Daveoc64
    Sep 30, 10:21 AM
    In 2005 AT&T was passing out 3G SIMS like raffle tickets in phones that weren't 3G -I need some internal wireless guru to tell if that extra hand-off doesn't make a difference.

    That makes no difference whatsoever.

    A 2G phone simply ignores the 3G features of the USIM.

    As far as the 2G phone is concerned, 3G doesn't exist. It has no impact on any network (2G or 3G).





    design background in photoshop. Abstract firewall ackground
  • Abstract firewall ackground



  • DTphonehome
    Jul 21, 12:41 PM
    Don't mean to be a wet blanket, but I didn't care about Apple's market share when it was slipping in the 90s and I don't care about it now that it's climbing. I didn't buy my Mac to be popular and I don't particularly care that lots of people are (or are not) using them. It's just an irrelevant metric to me.
    ...
    Besides, Apple deals in the kind of quality that will keep it around for many, many years, regardless of which way its market share is going and that's all that I care about.

    You do realize that if Apple's marketshare were to drop to, say, 1% or lower, they would have very little money to spend on R&D, and the quality and innovation you seek would suffer tremendously? Which is why Apple was doing dismally in the 90's and is doing much better today. They are now flush with cash, and can pump out great hardware products, and develop and refine the software that drives sales. Market share (and high margins) is important to ensure a steady flow of cash for those projects.

    So, you don't care about how market share affects you, but if you were the only Mac user, I assure you, Apple wouldn't be manufacturing products just for your puny market share. (To make an extreme example)





    design background in photoshop. Design Photoshop Tutorials
  • Design Photoshop Tutorials



  • TuffLuffJimmy
    Mar 3, 07:34 PM
    This thread made me puke a little in my mouth. The people in this thread who use a person's life as their own entertainment constantly commenting on his every move. Not surprising it's the same people who post the same inane judgements on just about every other celebrity.


    Now about that briefcase full of cocaine... :p





    design background in photoshop. retain the ackground and
  • retain the ackground and



  • Bfat567
    Nov 6, 12:08 AM
    I'd like some speakers/subs for the Lincoln and possibly a new exhaust too. :D



    I fully support the bump, but there are wayyyyy better choices out there for your money than the Mtx Terminator series.





    design background in photoshop. Your design should now look
  • Your design should now look



  • hulugu
    Dec 5, 01:10 PM
    Indeed on first read, I'd say that he presents a convincing argument. I'll go along with his diagnosis that there's no hole that could open you up to arbitrary code execution. If that's your definition of a security hole, then it follows that there's no security hole there. But it's still leaving you open the possibility that the operating system may crash for no apparent reason, causing you to lose any unsaved work.

    Lost work... Depending on how productive you are, that can easily result in monetary damage being done.

    As I posted previously, that leaves you in no worse a situation than you always are if you're running a desktop computer without a UPS. But I think that it still warrants attention.

    At best it still qualifies as an inconvenience, because the savvy user who saves her work regularly will only have lost 5 or 6 minutes of productivity including the reboot. At worst, it can result in hours of lost work for the user who doesn't understand the "save your work" mantra -- especially if we're talking about somebody who's protected by a battery backup and doesn't think that unexpected reboots should be possible on such an inherently stable operating system.

    And it's undoubtedly a bug inside Apple's software that's causing this problem, therefore it is absolutely appropriate that Apple should be expected to fix it. I appreciate anybody's effort to bring such bugs to light, because that increases the probability that Apple will find out about it and fix it.

    I'm saying Apple shouldn't fix it, I'm merely pointing out that many people are reacting to the MOKB as a wealth of major security flaws.
    This is a bug, an annoying bug that should be fixed, but that's very different from a security flaw in which a crash can be used to inject malicious code. MOKB's author LMH was wrong about this particular instance and he did not do the research required of a security professional in this particular problem.

    Again, don't dismiss the MOKB or the warnings from Secunia or F-Secure or even the demonstrations by Ellrich and Johnny Cache, instead we need to assess the problem as best we can.

    I would say that you probably shouldn't be installing .dmgs while you're doing important work that hasn't been saved, that's just asking for trouble.





    design background in photoshop. photoshop patterns is very
  • photoshop patterns is very



  • Cloudane
    Jan 25, 06:39 PM
    Not a stock expert, but I do know the tech industry on the whole is suffering a bit of a slump at the moment. Redundancy cometh where I work.





    design background in photoshop. Background in Photoshop.
  • Background in Photoshop.



  • fcortese
    Apr 1, 08:17 PM
    My 1 year-old a couple of days before his first birthday (click for larger).

    http://gallery.me.com/crebelein/100053/IMG_5637/web.jpg

    Hope he is doing well.

    Hello all, my first post on these forums... :)

    http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5057/5581017226_9f0a09cd04.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/61296751@N04/5581017226/)
    R0010609 (http://www.flickr.com/photos/61296751@N04/5581017226/) by contracteur (http://www.flickr.com/people/61296751@N04/), on Flickr




    design background in photoshop. A microcosm of the design
  • A microcosm of the design



  • gotohamish
    Apr 26, 11:28 AM
    You don't need to keep taking computers back you know. You could try and be happy with what you already own. Also why did you buy it if you knew there were new ones on the horizon anyway?

    Also, if one were to buy a Mac within two weeks prior to a new model you're entitled to just take it back for the new model, or at least that's how it used to work.





    design background in photoshop. Photoshop lightroom
  • Photoshop lightroom



  • countach
    Oct 24, 09:07 AM
    (Guess I would want the non-glossy screen? I guess that looks like a normal desktop LCD?)

    Do some google searches on the pros and cons. The glossy has a sharper image with brighter colors. It even has less glare under some circumstances.





    design background in photoshop. Interface Design Photoshop
  • Interface Design Photoshop



  • Chimera
    Oct 24, 07:44 AM
    I hereby declare an end to all the "Waiting for Moron" threads.

    We've alreaddy seen threads entitled "Waiting for Santa Rosa" though, I think this will be a never ending cycle under intel. :(





    design background in photoshop. Create Sun Day Design
  • Create Sun Day Design



  • IJ Reilly
    Jul 10, 05:45 PM
    Part of the problem is the way they market it. There was such an emphasis on templates and graphic-intensive stuff when it was first demoed in MacWorld 2005 that it's hard to think it can be a good word processor. My first thought was how it looked 100x better than Microsoft Publisher.

    Again, I think this latest rumor shows that Apple will address some of the perceptions (or misperceptions, depending on who you ask) by allowing people to dive into word processing mode and adding better search and research functions. It just might make me a convert.

    I entirely agree with you on these points. Apple is barely marketing iWork at all, let alone in a way which would help people understand its value. At MW last January I made a point of mentioning the Mac owner confusion over what Pages does to one of the reps on the floor who was demonstrating the new version. He also happened to be on the Pages programming team. (Which game me an opportunity to show him a bug I'd found. :))

    He seemed surprised to be hearing what I was telling him, and I wasn't entirely sure he believed me in the end, but perhaps this rumor reflects some understanding on Apple's part that they're not getting the message out about these applications, particularly Pages. Maybe they'll get serious about marketing in version 3.

    One other thing, I think Apple ought to be bundling iWork with most if not all of their systems, and not necessarily because we like to get free booty. The more Mac owners used iWork, the more who would see the value in forking out for the upgrades. This is exactly how Apple already markets iLife, so why they're not doing this for iWork is just plain mystifying.





    design background in photoshop. wallpaper in Photoshop.
  • wallpaper in Photoshop.



  • KnightWRX
    Apr 13, 07:54 PM
    Actually, I'd call this bad news. It pretty much confirms that iP5 isn't coming any time soon.

    I think the lack of a March/April iOS 5 preview pretty much confirmed that. No new OS, no new iPhone. If we get the preview in June at WWDC, that means we get new hardware in September, which is likely to be the launch date of iOS 5.

    This again is based off of Apple always shipping a new OS with a new iPhone.





    design background in photoshop. to design the ackground
  • to design the ackground



  • rmhop81
    Apr 26, 01:38 PM
    It'll be a pathetic excuse for a cloud if it'll only stream in the US (which if they continue with this 1 datacenter model will be the case). Amazon will beat them here, hands down. Have you seen how many datacenters they have?

    http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2008/11/18/where-amazons-data-centers-are-located/

    ^ That vs 1 datacenter...lets think...who's going to get the better performance...

    Also, the point of the cloud is redundancy. What happens WHEN the 1 datacenter goes down (e.g power problems, network problems, natural disasters, etc)? Apple's will be wiped out in one move, Amazon just fail over to another DC location.

    http://abclocal.go.com/kabc/story?section=news/business&id=8086729





    design background in photoshop. This was another design done
  • This was another design done



  • Sounds Good
    Apr 21, 02:27 PM
    Likely the Sandy Bridge. Editing uses CPU power.
    Thanks.





    design background in photoshop. Wallpaper using Photoshop.
  • Wallpaper using Photoshop.



  • svenn
    Mar 10, 03:00 PM
    I love the title of this thread...





    design background in photoshop. Tags Background, photoshop
  • Tags Background, photoshop



  • mwayne85
    Apr 25, 12:10 PM
    I think dual core i7 or i5 is more likely for the base 21.5". It's great there will be newer machines. I won't be upgrading my 4-month-old base. Instead, I'd get a SSD, 128GB or 160GB would do fine for me. Waiting for the prices to fall down.

    There aren't any desktop Sandy Bridge dual-core i7s. The low-end will most likely be either dual-core i3 or i5, however there's only one dual-core i5, the rest of the i5s and i7s are all quads.





    design background in photoshop. Background with a Soft Glow
  • Background with a Soft Glow



  • brotato
    Apr 28, 10:59 PM
    Sweet pics. :D
    Great pictures.

    Proof positive that Apple did modify the phone but not the antenna. How do I know that?

    Because you've all convinced me that Steve The Great, is never wrong.

    Oh crap! Did I just say that? LOL

    Thanks! :D





    design background in photoshop. Vista Background Photoshop
  • Vista Background Photoshop



  • grahamnp
    May 3, 08:56 AM
    Not really sure why Apple can't bring themselves to put an i7 by default in a $2,000 machine. That's kind of ridiculous.

    It annoys me too but it works out pretty well for Apple and I'd much rather pay extra for the i7 than not have the option at all. Look at the latest MBPs compared to the previous ones, Apple bumped the GPUs up significantly but charged $200 more and yet everyone is happy.





    Minimoose 360
    Apr 24, 03:13 PM
    What product will the T-Mobile chic bash now??? :rolleyes:

    She can bash my handset any day ;)





    bmwhd
    May 4, 08:58 AM
    This is actually consistent with what I'm hearing too. Fall release, combined GSM/CDMA platform.





    franky303
    Mar 31, 01:39 PM
    they should have better added a week view for iphone's ical ...





    chrmjenkins
    May 1, 09:15 PM
    If ucfgrad isn't the wolf, I figure jav must be. I was undecided between the two, so not.voting was essentially the same as voting.





    lilo777
    Apr 23, 12:48 AM
    You enjoy seeing every issue from the perspective of someone who wants Apple to fail.

    Apple cares very deeply about their product, which is why they don't give in to every spec junkie who demands the latest and greatest immediately. The current chips don't give a usable battery life in Apple's eyes. If you want to get a phone that eats batteries that's your business, but Apple doesn't have an interest in developing anything like that.


    Nope. I see every issue from the consumer perspective - as I should (being a consumer). Any other perspective would be an abomination (unless for those who hold tons of AAPL shares).
    Phrases like "in Apple's eyes" is a good example of what I am talking about. Apple does not use iPhones, consumers do. Consumer eyse are the only eyes that matter. And that is exactly why people are switching to Android. If Apple cares more about what they think is right than what I think is right (for me) it would be stupid for me to care about what Apple thinks or does.


    They would still have to use two chips as I understand it: one to support CDMA and then the other to support LTE.

    I doubt that but even if that was the case then what? Every other phone manufacturer on the planet can design a phone that has LTE and Apple could not? Because they spend on R&D much less than any other hi-tech company of comparable size?

    And there we have it friends! This guy has no clue what he's talking about. There are no hybrid LTE/3G chips available yet, so the multiple chips thing has nothing to do with GSM/CDMA. If Apple wanted to support 3G AND LTE which they would have to do considering how scarce LTE is at the moment, the only way for them to do it is to use two chips. Battery life would drain.

    Here's a site for you to consider: Thunderbolt Battery Life (http://www.gottabemobile.com/2011/03/18/htc-thunderbolt-battery-life/)

    This is what people are talking about when they say the iPhone's battery life would be horrible. It has nothing to do with a hybrid CDMA/GSM chip, and has everything to do with the lack of a hybrid 3G/LTE chip.

    In fact, hybrid CDMA/GSM chips exist, and are already being used by Apple.

    You miss the point. I did not investigate the details about the number of chips. Not everyone cares. The point here is that there many people who want LTE and the there is Apple with their "single phone fits all" strategy. Here is a piece of relevant information for you from Information Week:

    "In its recently quarterly earnings report, Verizon Wireless noted that more than 500,000 customers signed up for LTE services and/or devices during its most recent quarter. Add that to the 65,000 who signed up in December, and Verizon has about 565,000 people using its next-generation wireless network. At this rate, Verizon may have more than 2 million 4G users by the end of the year.
    Of the 500,000 who signed up for 4G services this quarter, more than half (260,000) chose a 4G phone--the HTC Thunderbolt--that went on sale in mid-March. It scored a significant number of customers in its first two weeks of availability. That means between January 1 and March 15, about 240,000 people purchased other 4G devices, such as USB modems."

    As you can see 260K people bought HTC Thunderbolt since Verizon started selling them (about a month). This translates to about 3 million phones annually. Clearly the demand is there. Also, you keep forgetting that other phones have swappable batteries.



    No comments:

    Post a Comment